On Monday, October 8, 2018 8:15:08 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-10-18, 14:07, Anson Huang wrote:
> > On i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL, accessing OCOTP directly is wrong because
> > the ocotp clock needs to be enabled first. Add support for reading
> > OCOTP through the nvmem API, and keep the old method there to
> > support old dtb.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > changes since V3:
> >     put node earlier to save one line code.
> >  drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 52 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c 
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > index b2ff423..8cfee0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> >  #include <linux/err.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> > @@ -290,20 +291,32 @@ static void imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(struct 
> > device *dev)
> >  #define OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_792MHZ       0x2
> >  #define OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_900MHZ       0x3
> >  
> > -static void imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> > +static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -   struct device_node *np;
> > -   void __iomem *base;
> >     u32 val;
> > +   int ret = 0;
> >  
> > -   np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6ul-ocotp");
> > -   if (!np)
> > -           return;
> > +   if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
> > +           ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
> > +           if (ret)
> > +                   return ret;
> > +   } else {
> > +           struct device_node *np;
> > +           void __iomem *base;
> > +
> > +           np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6ul-ocotp");
> > +           if (!np)
> > +                   return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > +           base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > +           of_node_put(np);
> > +           if (!base) {
> > +                   dev_err(dev, "failed to map ocotp\n");
> > +                   return -EFAULT;
> > +           }
> >  
> > -   base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > -   if (!base) {
> > -           dev_err(dev, "failed to map ocotp\n");
> > -           goto put_node;
> > +           val = readl_relaxed(base + OCOTP_CFG3);
> > +           iounmap(base);
> >     }
> >  
> >     /*
> > @@ -314,7 +327,6 @@ static void imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct 
> > device *dev)
> >      * 2b'11: 900000000Hz on i.MX6ULL only;
> >      * We need to set the max speed of ARM according to fuse map.
> >      */
> > -   val = readl_relaxed(base + OCOTP_CFG3);
> >     val >>= OCOTP_CFG3_SPEED_SHIFT;
> >     val &= 0x3;
> >  
> > @@ -334,9 +346,7 @@ static void imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct 
> > device *dev)
> >                             dev_warn(dev, "failed to disable 900MHz OPP\n");
> >     }
> >  
> > -   iounmap(base);
> > -put_node:
> > -   of_node_put(np);
> > +   return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > @@ -394,10 +404,18 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> >     }
> >  
> >     if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
> > -       of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull"))
> > -           imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(cpu_dev);
> > -   else
> > +       of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
> > +           ret = imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(cpu_dev);
> > +           if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +                   return ret;
> > +           if (ret) {
> > +                   dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to read ocotp: %d\n",
> > +                           ret);
> > +                   return ret;
> > +           }
> > +   } else {
> >             imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(cpu_dev);
> > +   }
> >  
> >     /* Because we have added the OPPs here, we must free them */
> >     free_opp = true;
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Patch applied, thanks!

Reply via email to