Commit-ID:  53bf57fab7321fb42b703056a4c80fc9d986d170
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/53bf57fab7321fb42b703056a4c80fc9d986d170
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:01:18 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:33:53 +0200

locking/qspinlock: Re-order code

Flip the branch condition after atomic_fetch_or_acquire(_Q_PENDING_VAL)
such that we loose the indent. This also result in a more natural code
flow IMO.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: andrea.pa...@amarulasolutions.com
Cc: long...@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003130257.156322...@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index bfaeb05123ff..ec343276f975 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -330,39 +330,37 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, 
u32 val)
         * 0,0,1 -> 0,1,1 ; pending
         */
        val = atomic_fetch_or_acquire(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
-       if (!(val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)) {
-               /*
-                * We're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
-                *
-                * *,1,1 -> *,1,0
-                *
-                * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the
-                * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
-                * sequentiality; this is because not all
-                * clear_pending_set_locked() implementations imply full
-                * barriers.
-                */
-               if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) {
-                       atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val,
-                                                !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_MASK));
-               }
-
-               /*
-                * take ownership and clear the pending bit.
-                *
-                * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
-                */
-               clear_pending_set_locked(lock);
-               qstat_inc(qstat_lock_pending, true);
-               return;
+       /*
+        * If we observe any contention; undo and queue.
+        */
+       if (unlikely(val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)) {
+               if (!(val & _Q_PENDING_MASK))
+                       clear_pending(lock);
+               goto queue;
        }
 
        /*
-        * If pending was clear but there are waiters in the queue, then
-        * we need to undo our setting of pending before we queue ourselves.
+        * We're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
+        *
+        * 0,1,1 -> 0,1,0
+        *
+        * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the
+        * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
+        * sequentiality; this is because not all
+        * clear_pending_set_locked() implementations imply full
+        * barriers.
+        */
+       if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
+               atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_MASK));
+
+       /*
+        * take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+        *
+        * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
         */
-       if (!(val & _Q_PENDING_MASK))
-               clear_pending(lock);
+       clear_pending_set_locked(lock);
+       qstat_inc(qstat_lock_pending, true);
+       return;
 
        /*
         * End of pending bit optimistic spinning and beginning of MCS

Reply via email to