On 10/18/18 07:56, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 12:53 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 10/17/18 12:08, James Bottomley wrote: > [...] >>>> Trying to understand how you are understanding my comment vs what >>>> I intended to communicate, it seems to me that you are focused on >>>> the "where allowed" and I am focused on the "which email >>>> addresses". >>>> >>>> More clear? Or am I still not communicating well enough? >>> >>> I think the crux of the disagreement is that you think the carve >>> out equates to a permission which is not specific enough and I >>> think it >> >> Nope. That is a big place where I was not transferring my thoughts >> to clear communication. I agree that what I wrote should have been >> written in terms of carve out instead of permission. >> >> >>> doesn't equate to a permission at all, which is why there's no need >>> to make it more explicit. Is that a fair characterisation? >> >> Nope. My concern is "which email addresses". > > The idea here was because it's a carve out that doesn't give permission > and because the permission is ruled by the project contribution > documents, the carve out should be broad enough to cover anything they > might say hence "email addresses not ordinarily collected by the > project" are still included as unacceptable behaviour. > > Perhaps if you propose the wording you'd like to see it would help > because there still looks to be some subtlety I'm not getting.
>From the beginning of the thread: > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks > * Public or private harassment > * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic > - address, without explicit permission > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a > professional setting Alternative (and I'm sure someone else can probably clean this up a little bit): + address that has been provided in a public space for the project, without explicit permission See you in Edinburgh, -Frank > > James > > > >
