Hi Stephen, On 10/18/2018 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12) >> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31) >>> >>> >>> On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote: >>>> Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick >>>> test I did. >>>> >>> Thanks !!. Can i take that as >>> Tested-by: Craig Tatlor <ctatlo...@gmail.com> ? >>> >> >> Is this patch series going to be resent? >> > > Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're > good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the > registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would > appreciate it. >
Sorry for the late response. Was away. Only pending thing was separating out the binding documentation for the cpu-freq driver and fixing the text in documentation. That means, yes its fine to merge the clk ones as you said. I will resend that. Also, will send a follow up series for clk_hw to clk change as you mentioned separately. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
