On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:35:22PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:10:47AM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So I feel that he automation model is just not good. The reply should > > go to the actual pull request, not to the git history. People who want > > just _that_ could already automate the git history thing without me > > even doing anything at all, either scripting it themselves or by using > > some filtering on the kernel commit mailing list..
> Can you tag merge commit with message-id of the pull request? > Automation machinery can reply to the pull request with proper CC list > obtained from the archive? If you're doing that you could even just put all the info you'd get from the e-mail like the CC list into the tag (or git note or whatever), no need to bounce to a list archive.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
