On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Al Viro wrote:
>
> I think that we need to go the other way round - gather nameidata
> ->nd and ->dentry into struct path and pass pointer to that instead...
Yeah, that sounds fine too.
> But that's .23-rc1 fodder, if not .23-rc2 one (we might want to
> do -rc2 with just that, to avoid conflicts with pending patches).
> Definitely not for .22-final.
Oh, absolutely. I wasn't implying that we would want to do it today, but
as it is now, just looking at that code makes my eyes water.. So it would
be nice to fix that up.
One reason I would almost prefer an "nd", though, is that it would allow
us to in general always just convert anythign that now looks up a path to
look up "a path or file descriptor" instead. Those things need "nd" right
now, and if it's a "struct path", then you'll always have the two
different cases, rather than just the common "release_nd()" at the end.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
