On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:54 AM Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> I think if the point is to test for negative numbers, > it's clearer to do that before using min_t.and it's > probably clearer not to use min_t at all. > ... > > if (len > sizeof(int)) > len = sizeof(int); It is a matter of taste really, I know some people (like me) sometimes mixes min() and max() I would suggest that if someones wants to change the current code, a corresponding test would be added in tools/testing/selftests/net
