On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:09 PM Raju P.L.S.S.S.N <rpls...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
From: Lina Iyer <il...@codeaurora.org>
Controllers may be in 'solver' state, where they could be in autonomous
mode executing low power modes for their hardware and as such are not
available for sending active votes. Device driver may notify RPMH API
that the controller is in solver mode and when in such mode, disallow
requests from platform drivers for state change using the RSC.
Maybe I'm being dense, but I don't really get it. So in solver mode,
the whole RSC is just disabled? Solver mode just figures out what
state to put the hardware in without needing all these votes? Sounds
cool, why doesn't it just do that all the time? Can you describe an
example usecase of a real client that would use solver mode, and how
that works?
Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <il...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Raju P.L.S.S.S.N <rpls...@codeaurora.org>
---
Chanages in v3
- Add functionality to set solver mode for RSC controller
- return -EINVAL if active requests are sent in solver mode
---
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h | 5 ++++
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h | 5 ++++
4 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
index 4b891c23..0923c45 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
@@ -70,12 +70,14 @@ struct rpmh_request {
* @cache_lock: synchronize access to the cache data
* @dirty: was the cache updated since flush
* @batch_cache: Cache sleep and wake requests sent as batch
+ * @in_solver_mode: Controller is busy in solver mode
*/
struct rpmh_ctrlr {
struct list_head cache;
spinlock_t cache_lock;
bool dirty;
struct list_head batch_cache;
+ bool in_solver_mode;
};
/**
@@ -86,6 +88,7 @@ struct rpmh_ctrlr {
* @base: start address of the RSC's DRV registers
* @tcs_base: start address of the TCS registers in this controller
* @id: instance id in the controller (Direct Resource Voter)
+ * @in_solver_mode: Controller is in solver mode
* @num_tcs: number of TCSes in this DRV
* @tcs: TCS groups
* @tcs_in_use: s/w state of the TCS
@@ -97,6 +100,7 @@ struct rsc_drv {
void __iomem *base;
void __iomem *tcs_base;
int id;
+ bool in_solver_mode;
int num_tcs;
struct tcs_group tcs[TCS_TYPE_NR];
DECLARE_BITMAP(tcs_in_use, MAX_TCS_NR);
@@ -107,6 +111,7 @@ struct rsc_drv {
int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg);
int rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(struct rsc_drv *drv,
const struct tcs_request *msg);
+void rpmh_rsc_mode_solver_set(struct rsc_drv *drv, bool enable);
int rpmh_rsc_invalidate(struct rsc_drv *drv);
int rpmh_rsc_write_pdc_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request
*msg);
bool rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_idle(struct rsc_drv *drv);
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index 9cc303e..17126be 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -386,6 +386,11 @@ static int tcs_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct
tcs_request *msg)
return PTR_ERR(tcs);
spin_lock(&drv->lock);
+
+ if (msg->state == RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE && drv->in_solver_mode) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto done_write;
+ }
/*
* The h/w does not like if we send a request to the same address,
* when one is already in-flight or being processed.
@@ -525,6 +530,31 @@ static int tcs_ctrl_write(struct rsc_drv *drv, const
struct tcs_request *msg)
}
/**
+ * rpmh_rsc_mode_solver_set: Enable/disable solver mode
+ *
+ * @drv: The controller
+ *
+ * enable: boolean state to be set - true/false
Add an @?
+ */
+void rpmh_rsc_mode_solver_set(struct rsc_drv *drv, bool enable)
+{
+ int m;
+ struct tcs_group *tcs = get_tcs_of_type(drv, ACTIVE_TCS);
+
+again:
+ spin_lock(&drv->lock);
+ for (m = tcs->offset; m < tcs->offset + tcs->num_tcs; m++) {
+ if (!tcs_is_free(drv, m)) {
+ spin_unlock(&drv->lock);
+ goto again;
+ }
+ }
+ drv->in_solver_mode = enable;
+ spin_unlock(&drv->lock);
I don't see you actually telling the controller to be in solver mode.
So I guess this is more informing the rpmh driver that something has
happened behind its back? Maybe the example will help me understand
this.
+
+}
+
+/**
* rpmh_rsc_ctrlr_is_idle: Check if any of the AMCs are busy.
*
* @drv: The controller
@@ -718,6 +748,7 @@ static int rpmh_rsc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
spin_lock_init(&drv->lock);
+ drv->in_solver_mode = false;
bitmap_zero(drv->tcs_in_use, MAX_TCS_NR);
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, drv->id);
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
index 43eb981..e6e98d4 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -75,6 +76,42 @@ static struct rpmh_ctrlr *get_rpmh_ctrlr(const struct device
*dev)
return &drv->client;
}
+static int check_ctrlr_state(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr, enum rpmh_state state)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /* Do not allow setting active votes when in solver mode */
+ spin_lock(&ctrlr->cache_lock);
+ if (ctrlr->in_solver_mode && state == RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE)
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ spin_unlock(&ctrlr->cache_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rpmh_mode_solver_set: Indicate that the RSC controller hardware has
+ * been configured to be in solver mode
+ *
+ * @dev: the device making the request
+ * @enable: Boolean value indicating if the controller is in solver mode.
+ *
+ * When solver mode is enabled, passthru API will not be able to send wake
+ * votes, just awake and active votes.
I don't understand this comment, maybe sharpening up the terminology
will help me?
+ */
+int rpmh_mode_solver_set(const struct device *dev, bool enable)
+{
+ struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr = get_rpmh_ctrlr(dev);
+
+ spin_lock(&ctrlr->cache_lock);
+ rpmh_rsc_mode_solver_set(ctrlr_to_drv(ctrlr), enable);
+ ctrlr->in_solver_mode = enable;
+ spin_unlock(&ctrlr->cache_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmh_mode_solver_set);
+
void rpmh_tx_done(const struct tcs_request *msg, int r)
{
struct rpmh_request *rpm_msg = container_of(msg, struct rpmh_request,
@@ -230,8 +267,13 @@ int rpmh_write_async(const struct device *dev, enum
rpmh_state state,
const struct tcs_cmd *cmd, u32 n)
{
struct rpmh_request *rpm_msg;
+ struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr = get_rpmh_ctrlr(dev);
int ret;
+ ret = check_ctrlr_state(ctrlr, state);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
rpm_msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rpm_msg), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!rpm_msg)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -262,11 +304,16 @@ int rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state
state,
{
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(compl);
DEFINE_RPMH_MSG_ONSTACK(dev, state, &compl, rpm_msg);
+ struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr = get_rpmh_ctrlr(dev);
int ret;
if (!cmd || !n || n > MAX_RPMH_PAYLOAD)
return -EINVAL;
+ ret = check_ctrlr_state(ctrlr, state);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
memcpy(rpm_msg.cmd, cmd, n * sizeof(*cmd));
rpm_msg.msg.num_cmds = n;
@@ -353,6 +400,10 @@ int rpmh_write_batch(const struct device *dev, enum
rpmh_state state,
if (!cmd || !n)
return -EINVAL;
+ ret = check_ctrlr_state(ctrlr, state);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
while (n[count] > 0)
count++;
if (!count)
diff --git a/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h b/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h
index 4c4b013..e8356b6 100644
--- a/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h
+++ b/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ int rpmh_write_pdc_data(const struct device *dev,
int rpmh_ctrlr_idle(const struct device *dev);
+int rpmh_mode_solver_set(const struct device *dev, bool enable);
+
#else
static inline int rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
@@ -58,6 +60,9 @@ static inline int rpmh_write_pdc_data(const struct device
*dev,
static inline int rpmh_ctrlr_idle(const struct device *dev)
{ return -ENODEV; }
+static inline int rpmh_mode_solver_set(const struct device *dev, bool enable)
+{ return -ENODEV; }
+
#endif /* CONFIG_QCOM_RPMH */
#endif /* __SOC_QCOM_RPMH_H__ */
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
