Hi, On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:40 AM Alok Chauhan <al...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > fixed the nitpicks.
I probably would have put more a proper sentence, like: Fixed small nits that were pointed out on the mailing list. No functional change expected. ...but I guess it's up to Mark if he cares. > @@ -533,7 +530,7 @@ static irqreturn_t geni_spi_isr(int irq, void *data) > > writel(m_irq, se->base + SE_GENI_M_IRQ_CLEAR); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mas->lock, flags); > - return ret; > + return IRQ_HANDLED; I probably would have put a blank line before the return while I was at it, but it's not a big deal to me. Thanks for following up. Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
