> It will be solved differently longer term, but short term the fix > was still needed. There are limits on what can be done late > in the release cycle so simple patches win. > > Besides none of the "NAK"s were particularly inspired in my opinion; > there were no clear technical objections brought forward.
There were a considerable number of sensible logical objections. You just didn't agree with them. You've now effectively made .22 unsupportable since we don't know if someone has binary virtualiser crap loaded. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
