On Friday, 26 October 2018, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Eben Moglen <mog...@columbia.edu>: > reputational damage is *specifically* recognized as grounds for relief. > > No. Reputational damage is not mentioned at all, let alone > specifically recognized. I have no difficulty in finding the word "reputation" in the brief in in proximity with the phrase "increasing [the programmer's] recognition i
The parties' briefs are not the court opinion, and don't represent what was decided. Wrong document. I linked to the opinion in my message. Eben
