Hi,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:08 AM Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
<vbadi...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_v5_var = {
> .mci_removed = true,
> + .restore_dll_config = false,
> + .var_ops = &v5_var_ops,
> + .offset = &sdhci_msm_v5_offset,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdm845_sdhci_var = {
> + .mci_removed = true,
> + .restore_dll_config = true,
> .var_ops = &v5_var_ops,
> .offset = &sdhci_msm_v5_offset,
> };
One last thing: are there actually any "v5" controllers that _don't_
require restoring the DLL? Since "sdm845" is currently the only v5
controller maybe just set "restore_dll_config = true" for all v5
controllers and when there's a new v5 controller that doesn't need it
then match off the SoC-specific compatible string. As per my review
of the bindings patch IMO you should include both the "v5" and the
SoC-specific string for SDM845 (and all future SoCs) so you could make
the generic v5 case do this...
-Doug
