4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 84dad55951b0d009372ec21760b650634246e144 ]

The commit eb63f2964dbe ("udp6: add missing checks on edumux packet
processing") used the same return code convention of the ipv4 counterpart,
but ipv6 uses the opposite one: positive values means resubmit.

This change addresses the issue, using positive return value for
resubmitting. Also update the related comment, which was broken, too.

Fixes: eb63f2964dbe ("udp6: add missing checks on edumux packet processing")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv6/udp.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -794,11 +794,9 @@ static int udp6_unicast_rcv_skb(struct s
 
        ret = udpv6_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb);
 
-       /* a return value > 0 means to resubmit the input, but
-        * it wants the return to be -protocol, or 0
-        */
+       /* a return value > 0 means to resubmit the input */
        if (ret > 0)
-               return -ret;
+               return ret;
        return 0;
 }
 


Reply via email to