I was wrong, openVz blocks sys_swapon/swapoff syscalls inside containers.
Our kernel just emulates /proc/swaps output inside containers,
it is enough for 'swapon' userspace to do not fail and show required info.

So I do not have any special arguments for proposed patch.

On 11/5/18 8:19 AM, Vasily Averin wrote:
> On 11/5/18 3:57 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Vasily Averin <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> Currently newly allocated swap_info_struct can be quickly freed.
>>> This patch avoid uneccessary high-order page allocation and helps
>>> to decrease the memory pressure.
>>
>> I think swapon/swapoff are rare operations, so it will not increase the
>> memory pressure much.
> 
> You are right, typically it should not affect usual nodes.
> 
> It's OpenVz-specific usecase.
> 
> OpenVz allows hosters to run hundreds of non-trusted containers per node.
> Our containers have enabled "virtual swap" functionality, 
> and container's owners can call sys_swapon without any limits.
> Containers can be restarted in any time and we would like to 
> decrease number of unnecessary high-order memory allocations.
> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/swapfile.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
>>> index 8688ae65ef58..53ec2f0cdf26 100644
>>> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
>>> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
>>> @@ -2809,14 +2809,17 @@ late_initcall(max_swapfiles_check);
>>>  
>>>  static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
>>>  {
>>> -   struct swap_info_struct *p;
>>> +   struct swap_info_struct *p = NULL;
>>>     unsigned int type;
>>>     int i;
>>> +   bool force_alloc = false;
>>>  
>>> -   p = kvzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> -   if (!p)
>>> -           return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> -
>>> +retry:
>>> +   if (force_alloc) {
>>> +           p = kvzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +           if (!p)
>>> +                   return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +   }
>>>     spin_lock(&swap_lock);
>>>     for (type = 0; type < nr_swapfiles; type++) {
>>>             if (!(swap_info[type]->flags & SWP_USED))
>>> @@ -2828,6 +2831,11 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
>>>             return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
>>>     }
>>>     if (type >= nr_swapfiles) {
>>> +           if (!force_alloc) {
>>> +                   force_alloc = true;
>>> +                   spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
>>> +                   goto retry;
>>> +           }
>>>             p->type = type;
>>>             swap_info[type] = p;
>>>             /*
>>

Reply via email to