On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 03:11:56PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 05-11-18 14:17:01, Vasily Averin wrote:
> > commit a2468cc9bfdf ("swap: choose swap device according to numa node")
> > changed 'avail_lists' field of 'struct swap_info_struct' to an array.
> > In popular linux distros it increased size of swap_info_struct up to
> > 40 Kbytes and now swap_info_struct allocation requires order-4 page.
> > Switch to kvzmalloc allows to avoid unexpected allocation failures.
>
> While this fixes the most visible issue is this a good long term
> solution? Aren't we wasting memory without a good reason? IIRC our limit
That's right, we need a better way of handling this in the long term.
> for swap files/devices is much smaller than potential NUMA nodes numbers
> so we can safely expect that would be only few numa affine nodes. I am
> not really familiar with the rework which has added numa node awareness
> but I wouls assueme that we should either go with one global table with
> a linked list of possible swap_info structure per numa node or use a
> sparse array.
There is a per-numa-node plist of available swap devices, so every swap
device needs an entry on those per-numa-node plist.
I think we can convert avail_lists from array to pointer and use vzalloc
to allocate the needed memory. MAX_NUMANODES can be used for a simple
implementation, or use the precise online node number but then we will
need to handle node online/offline events.
sparse array sounds promising, I'll take a look, thanks for the pointer.
> That being said I am not really objecting to this patch as it is simple
> and backportable to older (stable kernels).
>
> I would even dare to add
> Fixes: a2468cc9bfdf ("swap: choose swap device according to numa node")
>
> because not being able to add a swap space on a fragmented system looks
> like a regression to me.
Agree, especially it used to work.
Regards,
Aaron
> > Acked-by: Aaron Lu <aaron...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <v...@virtuozzo.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> > ---
> > mm/swapfile.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> > index 644f746e167a..8688ae65ef58 100644
> > --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> > +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> > @@ -2813,7 +2813,7 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
> > unsigned int type;
> > int i;
> >
> > - p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + p = kvzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!p)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > @@ -2824,7 +2824,7 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
> > }
> > if (type >= MAX_SWAPFILES) {
> > spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> > - kfree(p);
> > + kvfree(p);
> > return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
> > }
> > if (type >= nr_swapfiles) {
> > @@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
> > smp_wmb();
> > nr_swapfiles++;
> > } else {
> > - kfree(p);
> > + kvfree(p);
> > p = swap_info[type];
> > /*
> > * Do not memset this entry: a racing procfs swap_next()
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
>
