Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2018-11-03 00:00:02)
> From: Taniya Das <[email protected]>
>
> Add rpm smd clocks, PMIC and bus clocks which are required on QCS404
> for clients to vote on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Anu Ramanathan <[email protected]>
> [bjorn: Dropped cxo, voter clocks and static initialization]
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> ---
Patch looks OK.
Applied to clk-next, with a complaint below.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> index 850c02a52248..d3aadaeb2903 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> @@ -611,10 +611,55 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_msm8996 = {
> .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_clks),
> };
>
> +/* QCS404 */
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_QDSS(qcs404, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK,
> 1);
> +
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(qcs404, pnoc_clk, pnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(qcs404, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
Just curious, do we need to keep redefining these clks for each SoC?
Perhaps we should try to consolidate the clks that are common among SoCs
so we can reduce the number of static structs lying around in this
driver.
