* Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do you feel about some variant of this going into 2.6.23-rc1? I > initially thought of this as a 2.6.24 thing, but as it now looks > solid, maybe we can hurry things along.
yeah, fine by me. You were working on a more generic patch, right? I think a good approach would be an atomic notifier chain. > If Shaohua ports his spinlock->mutex convertion to the sched branch, > we get some real benefits: > > - reduced latencies for desktop users > - less kvm patches to carry in -rt (maybe none?) yeah, and i think we can reach 'none'. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/