On 10/12/2018 8:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:48:58PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti wrote:From: Vijay Viswanath <vvisw...@codeaurora.org> The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for the required load. Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vvisw...@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadi...@codeaurora.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt index 502b3b8..cb22178 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ Required properties: "xo" - TCXO clock (optional) "cal" - reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) "sleep" - sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) +- qcom,<supply>-current-level-microamp - specifies load levels for supply during BUS_ON and + BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be specified in + pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and BUS_ON respectively. + Units uA.Seems like something that should be common?
Hi Rob, Can you please little elaborate your comment? Do mean this should be common for all vendors, not specific to qcom-mmc? Thanks, Veera
