On (11/08/18 21:44), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > If lockdep and OOM people will ACK buffered printk transition in > its current form, then we can go ahead.
That printk_safe approach in lockdep, BTW, does not change (convert)
any printk-s within lockdep, thus Peter's earlycon should not be
affected. So Peter will have earlycon working, syzbot folks will have
buffered lockdep print outs.
-ss
