3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit b9576fc3624eb9fc88bec0d0ae883fd78be86239 ]
The xfstests test suite assumes that an attempt to collapse range on
the range (0, 1) will return EOPNOTSUPP if the file system does not
support collapse range. Commit 280227a75b56: "ext4: move check under
lock scope to close a race" broke this, and this caused xfstests to
fail when run when testing file systems that did not have the extents
feature enabled.
Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwli...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 6dbfa92bf78a..1e51008e237f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -5400,6 +5400,14 @@ int ext4_collapse_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t
offset, loff_t len)
loff_t new_size, ioffset;
int ret;
+ /*
+ * We need to test this early because xfstests assumes that a
+ * collapse range of (0, 1) will return EOPNOTSUPP if the file
+ * system does not support collapse range.
+ */
+ if (!ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
/* Collapse range works only on fs block size aligned offsets. */
if (offset & (EXT4_CLUSTER_SIZE(sb) - 1) ||
len & (EXT4_CLUSTER_SIZE(sb) - 1))
--
2.17.1
