On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:45:03AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:22:13AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:07:37 +0200 Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We reserved a different syscall number than the one that is used right now > > > in the patch. Please drop this patch... Martin or I will wire up the > > > syscall > > > as soon as the x86 variant is merged. Everything else just causes trouble > > > and > > > confusion. > > > > OK, I dropped all the fallocate patches. > > Andrew, I want to clarify who is going to push the fallocate patches. > I can either push them to Linus as part of the ext4 patch set, or we > can wait for you to push them. I thought since you had them in -mm > and we were going to wait you to push them (and presume that this was > going to happen soon). > > Alternatively I can push them directly to Linus along with other ext4 > patches. We can drop the s390 patch if Martin or Heiko wants to wire > it up themselves. > > As far as I know there hasn't been any real contention on the actual > syscall patches, other than the numbering issues, so it seems that > pushing them to Linus sooner rather than later is the right thing to > do.
Where is the latest and greatest version of those patches? Is it still the patch set distributed in 2.6.22-rc6-mm1? I'd mostly like to see the final set of flags we're planning on supporting. But yeah, I second the "sooner rather than later" :) --Mark -- Mark Fasheh Senior Software Developer, Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/