4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit b7dfee2433576f1f030cb84cdb04b70f36554992 ]

The description of the CSI_SEL bit in the i.MX6 reference manual is
incorrect. It states "This bit defines which CSI is the input to the
IC. This bit is effective only if IC_INPUT is bit cleared".

>From experiment it was found this is in fact not correct. The CSI_SEL
bit selects which CSI is input to _both_ the VDIC _and_ the IC. If the
IC_INPUT bit is set so that the IC is receiving from the VDIC, the IC
ignores the CSI_SEL bit, but CSI_SEL still selects which CSI the VDIC
receives from in that case.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerb...@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c
index b9539f7c5e9a..99c813a4ec1f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c
@@ -715,15 +715,16 @@ void ipu_set_ic_src_mux(struct ipu_soc *ipu, int csi_id, 
bool vdi)
        spin_lock_irqsave(&ipu->lock, flags);
 
        val = ipu_cm_read(ipu, IPU_CONF);
-       if (vdi) {
+       if (vdi)
                val |= IPU_CONF_IC_INPUT;
-       } else {
+       else
                val &= ~IPU_CONF_IC_INPUT;
-               if (csi_id == 1)
-                       val |= IPU_CONF_CSI_SEL;
-               else
-                       val &= ~IPU_CONF_CSI_SEL;
-       }
+
+       if (csi_id == 1)
+               val |= IPU_CONF_CSI_SEL;
+       else
+               val &= ~IPU_CONF_CSI_SEL;
+
        ipu_cm_write(ipu, val, IPU_CONF);
 
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipu->lock, flags);
-- 
2.17.1



Reply via email to