On 09-11-18, 14:31, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 10:38:19AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 08-11-18, 15:04, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > +
> > > +- #phy-cells:
> > > +    Value type: <u32>
> > > +    Definition: Should be 0.
> > 
> > I dont quite understand the definition that it should be 0, maybe you
> > mean allowed value is 0, if so why have this property?
> 
> The property is defined by generic phy bindings phy/phy-bindings.txt.
> I can add a pointer to it if you think that's necessary.  The property
> should be 0 for our device, because there is zero number cell in phy
> specifier from dwc3 node as shown in the example.

That makes sense, also does it make sense it mention the properties in
phy/phy-bindings.txt, why not refer that here for the properties we use
and vlaues.

> 
>       dwc3@78c0000 {
>               ...
>               phys = <&usb2_phy_prim>;
>               phy-names = "usb2-phy";
>       }
> 
> And for that reason, we can use the generic .of_xlate implementation
> of_phy_simple_xlate() provided by phy core.  There are some comments
> in kernel doc of of_phy_simple_xlate() which might be helpful.
> 
> Shawn

-- 
~Vinod

Reply via email to