From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzho...@gmail.com>

Because RCU avoids interrupting idle CPUs, rcu_is_watching() is used to
test whether or not it is currently legal to run RCU read-side critical
sections on this CPU.  However, the first sentence and last sentences
of current comment for rcu_is_watching have opposite meaning of what
is expected.  This commit therefore fixes this header comment.

Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzho...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index e7c9848d1e1b..429a46fb087a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -904,12 +904,12 @@ void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void)
 }
 
 /**
- * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is idle
+ * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is not idle
  *
  * Return true if RCU is watching the running CPU, which means that this
  * CPU can safely enter RCU read-side critical sections.  In other words,
- * if the current CPU is in its idle loop and is neither in an interrupt
- * or NMI handler, return true.
+ * if the current CPU is not in its idle loop or is in an interrupt or
+ * NMI handler, return true.
  */
 bool notrace rcu_is_watching(void)
 {
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to