From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzho...@gmail.com> Because RCU avoids interrupting idle CPUs, rcu_is_watching() is used to test whether or not it is currently legal to run RCU read-side critical sections on this CPU. However, the first sentence and last sentences of current comment for rcu_is_watching have opposite meaning of what is expected. This commit therefore fixes this header comment.
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzho...@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com> --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index e7c9848d1e1b..429a46fb087a 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -904,12 +904,12 @@ void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void) } /** - * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is idle + * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is not idle * * Return true if RCU is watching the running CPU, which means that this * CPU can safely enter RCU read-side critical sections. In other words, - * if the current CPU is in its idle loop and is neither in an interrupt - * or NMI handler, return true. + * if the current CPU is not in its idle loop or is in an interrupt or + * NMI handler, return true. */ bool notrace rcu_is_watching(void) { -- 2.17.1