On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:00:48PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:43:49 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Now that synchronize_rcu() waits for preempt-disable regions of code
> > as well as RCU read-side critical sections, synchronize_sched() can be
> > replaced by synchronize_rcu(). This commit therefore makes this change.
>
> Would you mean synchronize_rcu() can ensure that any interrupt handler
> (which should run under preempt-disable state) run out (even on non-preemptive
> kernel)?
Yes, but only as of this merge window. See this commit:
3e3100989869 ("rcu: Defer reporting RCU-preempt quiescent states when disabled")
Don't try this in v4.19 or earlier, but v4.20 and later is OK. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> If so, I agree with these changes.
>
> Thank you,
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamur...@intel.com>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/kprobes.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index 90e98e233647..08e31d863191 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int collect_garbage_slots(struct
> > kprobe_insn_cache *c)
> > struct kprobe_insn_page *kip, *next;
> >
> > /* Ensure no-one is interrupted on the garbages */
> > - synchronize_sched();
> > + synchronize_rcu();
> >
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(kip, next, &c->pages, list) {
> > int i;
> > @@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe
> > *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
> > if (ret) {
> > ap->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> > list_del_rcu(&p->list);
> > - synchronize_sched();
> > + synchronize_rcu();
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > ret = arm_kprobe(p);
> > if (ret) {
> > hlist_del_rcu(&p->hlist);
> > - synchronize_sched();
> > + synchronize_rcu();
> > goto out;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ void unregister_kprobes(struct kprobe **kps, int num)
> > kps[i]->addr = NULL;
> > mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> >
> > - synchronize_sched();
> > + synchronize_rcu();
> > for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> > if (kps[i]->addr)
> > __unregister_kprobe_bottom(kps[i]);
> > @@ -1966,7 +1966,7 @@ void unregister_kretprobes(struct kretprobe **rps,
> > int num)
> > rps[i]->kp.addr = NULL;
> > mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> >
> > - synchronize_sched();
> > + synchronize_rcu();
> > for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> > if (rps[i]->kp.addr) {
> > __unregister_kprobe_bottom(&rps[i]->kp);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
>
