On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:55:58 +0100 Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > However it would be basically cost-free to increase > > BINPRM_BUF_SIZE up to the point where sizeof(struct linux_binprm) == > > PAGE_SIZE? > > I don't think we should take sizeof(struct linux_binprm) into account, the > new members can come at any time and we can never decrease BINPRM_BUF_SIZE. My main point is.. why not make BINPRM_BUF_SIZE a lot larger than 256?
