Hi,
* Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [181114 17:04]:
> * Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> [181113 18:07]:
> > Hi
> >
> > * Belisko Marek <marek.beli...@gmail.com> [180703 18:34]:
> > > Hi Tony,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:45 AM Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Belisko Marek <marek.beli...@gmail.com> [180620 09:40]:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm trying to fix warning (for omap5 board) produced by recent change
> > > > > to avoid using IRQ_TYPE_NONE like:
> > > > > [ 1.818666] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 778 at
> > > > > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c:1016 gic_irq_domain_translate+0x78/0x100
> > > > > [ 1.828839] Modules linked in:
> > > > >
> > > > > I did look to other commit which did update and without deep knowledge
> > > > > I just simply do this small change:
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
> > > > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
> > > > > index 218892b..ab2df8c 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
> > > > > @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > palmas: palmas@48 {
> > > > > compatible = "ti,palmas";
> > > > > - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; /* IRQ_SYS_1N
> > > > > */
> > > > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_HIGH>; /* IRQ_SYS_1N
> > > > > */
> > > > > reg = <0x48>;
> > > > > interrupt-controller;
> > > > > #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > > >
> > > > > and it looks board boots fine. Only issue is that gpadc driver is not
> > > > > working (at least not getting interrupts at all ADC fails with
> > > > > timeout). I did look to gpadc driver and driver is not using
> > > > > interrupts defined in dts but request interrupt directly from palmas
> > > > > mfd module. Any ideas what needs to be changed to have gpadc again
> > > > > working with mentioned patch?
> > > >
> > > > Can you try with IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH added also to the flags to
> > > > regmap_add_irq_chip() in drivers/mfd/palmas.c?
> > > Nope issue is till present also after this change like:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
> > > index 218892b..6912769 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
> > > @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@
> > >
> > > palmas: palmas@48 {
> > > compatible = "ti,palmas";
> > > - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; /* IRQ_SYS_1N */
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /*
> > > IRQ_SYS_1N */
> > > reg = <0x48>;
> > > interrupt-controller;
> > > #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > @@ -432,9 +432,9 @@
> > >
> > > gpadc: gpadc {
> > > compatible = "ti,palmas-gpadc";
> > > - interrupts = <18 0
> > > - 16 0
> > > - 17 0>;
> > > + interrupts = <18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> > > + 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> > > + 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> > > ti,channel0-current-microamp = <5>;
> > > ti,channel3-current-microamp = <10>;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
> > > index 663a239..15d23db 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
> > > @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static int palmas_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> > > regmap_write(palmas->regmap[slave], addr, reg);
> > >
> > > ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(palmas->regmap[slave], palmas->irq,
> > > - IRQF_ONESHOT | pdata->irq_flags, 0,
> > > + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH |
> > > pdata->irq_flags, 0,
> > > driver_data->irq_chip,
> > > &palmas->irq_data);
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > goto err_i2c;
> >
> > Looks like the IRQ_TYPE_NONE issue still is there for omap5 and
> > should be fixed with IRQ_TYPE_HIGH.
>
> Looks like the gpadc interrupts get fixed for IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> if reconfiguring of PALMAS_POLARITY_CTRL_INT_POLARITY is disabled
> in drivers/mfd/palmas.c.
>
> The test being just:
>
> modprobe palmas-gpadc
> cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:device0/*
>
> > No idea about why palmas interrupts would stop working though,
> > Peter, do you have any ideas on this one?
>
> Still no idea why though, it seems tegra is inverting
> the interrupt externally because of earlier patches for adding
> "ti,irq-externally-inverted" property that never got added.
>
> So I'm guessing the PALMAS_POLARITY_CTRL_INT_POLARITY
> is wrongly configured on IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH while it should
> be done only for IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW instead?
>
> So adding Laxman to Cc also.
Now really adding Laxman to Cc.
Regards,
Tony
