On 14/11/18 06:57 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> As long as the argument was *required* to get distcc to work at all, you
> could expect people would figure out an argument is needed. In this case, I
> suspect nobody will ever know about this argument (except you).
I agree with this completely.
> Eventually, if you get a fix into icecc, we will need to change the
> Makefile, consider the version number and act accordingly.
Yeah, that's probably a sensible way forward.
> Anyhow, I’ll add an argument as you asked, and let Ingo (& others) be the
An argument to force it to a regular compile would at least help with
experimenting with this stuff.
Logan
