On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 01:12:53AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > and I kinda see the point of maybe not having your ssh username in the
> > URL. Not that it is a big deal for us, k.org users though.
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand the problem.  I have this in my .gitconfig:
> 
>     [url "ssh://g...@gitolite.kernel.org"]
>           insteadOf = https://git.kernel.org
>           insteadOf = http://git.kernel.org
>           insteadOf = git://git.kernel.org
> 
> because I thought that was the recommended way (see the end of
> https://korg.wiki.kernel.org/userdoc/gitolite). But that also makes my
> request-pull:
> 
>     $ git request-pull origin/master 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git 
> pci-v4.20-fixes-1
> 
> generate the ssh URL above.  If I remove the insteadOf stuff from
> .gitconfig, request-pull produces this instead:
> 
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git 
> tags/pci-v4.20-fixes-1
> 
> I'm happy to do either; just tell me which :)

You didn't really do anything wrong. In *general* I prefer to see
public URLs if they are sent to public lists, so if you're cc'ing
something to LKML, I would generally expect the pull request to have a
public URL like https://git.kernel.org/ instead of a private ssh:// URL
that is only accessible to people with a kernel.org account.

That's basically all there is to it. It doesn't *really* matter, since
Linus is the one who will be merging the actual pull request, and he
certainly has access to internal ssh:// URLs. However, in case someone
else was interested in reviewing the pull request, it would be more
friendly to have a public URL for them.

Best,
-K

Reply via email to