Hi Parthiban,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:32:35PM +0100, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote:
> Add I2C controller nodes for Actions Semiconductor S700 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi <p...@denx.de>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s700.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s700.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s700.dtsi
> index 192c7b39c8c1..573c844d7afe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s700.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s700.dtsi
> @@ -174,6 +174,46 @@
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> };
>
> + i2c0: i2c@e0170000 {
> + compatible = "actions,s900-i2c";
Why don't you add a compatible for S700? Also, please add the pinctrl
nodes for these busses and enable the ones exposed on board. These could
go in a separate patch.
Thanks,
Mani
> + reg = <0 0xe0170000 0 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&cmu CLK_I2C0>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + i2c1: i2c@e0174000 {
> + compatible = "actions,s900-i2c";
> + reg = <0 0xe0174000 0 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&cmu CLK_I2C1>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + i2c2: i2c@e0178000 {
> + compatible = "actions,s900-i2c";
> + reg = <0 0xe0178000 0 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&cmu CLK_I2C2>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + i2c3: i2c@e017c000 {
> + compatible = "actions,s900-i2c";
> + reg = <0 0xe017c000 0 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&cmu CLK_I2C3>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> sps: power-controller@e01b0100 {
> compatible = "actions,s700-sps";
> reg = <0x0 0xe01b0100 0x0 0x100>;
> --
> 2.17.2
>
