On 20.11.18 15:34, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 20-11-18 15:26:43, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> [...]
>>> +   do {
>>> +           for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn;)
>>> +           {
>>
>> { on a new line looks weird.
>>
>>> +                   /* start memory hot removal */
>>> +                   ret = -EINTR;
>>
>> I think we can move that into the "if (signal_pending(current))"
>>
>> (if my eyes are not wrong, this will not be touched otherwise)
> 
> Better?
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 9cd161db3061..6bc3aee30f5e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1592,11 +1592,10 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long 
> start_pfn,
>       }
>  
>       do {
> -             for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn;)
> -             {
> +             for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn;) {
>                       /* start memory hot removal */
> -                     ret = -EINTR;
>                       if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +                             ret = -EINTR;
>                               reason = "signal backoff";
>                               goto failed_removal_isolated;
>                       }
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>

:)

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to