On 11/22/18 12:01 PM, Aisheng DONG wrote:
> [...]
>>>> @@
>>>> -1437,10 +1552,18 @@ static int __maybe_unused flexcan_suspend(struct
>>>> device *device)
>>>> int err = 0;
>>>>
>>>> if (netif_running(dev)) {
>>>> - err = flexcan_chip_disable(priv);
>>>> - if (err)
>>>> - return err;
>>>> - err = pm_runtime_force_suspend(device);
>>>> + /* if wakeup is enabled, enter stop mode
>>>> + * else enter disabled mode.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (device_may_wakeup(device)) {
>>>> + enable_irq_wake(dev->irq);
>>>> + flexcan_enter_stop_mode(priv);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + err = flexcan_chip_disable(priv);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + return err;
>>>> + err = pm_runtime_force_suspend(device);
>>>
>>> This is mixed with runtime pm.
>>> I would suggestion you first upstream wakeup support.
>>> Then runtime pm later separately.
>>
>> In fact this patch is based on the patch "can: flexcan: Implement CAN Runtime
>> PM", which is still under review, too.
>
> Yes, please ignore rpm patch first.
> This patch will be re-made and not depends on rpm for easy review.
> After wakeup is ready, rpm patch will rebase on it.ok. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
