* Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Had to read this twice, because the comment and the code are both correct > > but deal with the inverse case. This might have helped: > > > > /* > > * Immediately update the speculation MSRs on the current task, > > * but for non-current tasks delay setting the CPU mitigation > > * until it is scheduled next. > > */ > > if (tsk == current && update) > > speculation_ctrl_update_current(); > > > > But can the target task ever be non-current here? I don't think so: the > > two callers are prctl and seccomp, and both are passing in the current > > task pointer. > > See te other mail. Yes, seccomp passes non current task pointers. Will > update the comment. Ignore my previous mail :-) Thanks, Ingo
