HI! > > > > > > > You have general-purpose LED, yet you are treating it as > > > > > > > "something > > > > > > > special". That means ugly code (quoted above) and lack of > > > > > > > flexibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, if my notebook lacks HDD LED, I can use scrollock > > > > > > > LED for > > > > > > > that instead. Or, in reverse way, maybe "mic mute" LED is not > > > > > > > useful > > > > > > > for me, and I'd like to use it for notifications instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not against adding the LEDs device implementation for any exotic > > > > > > usage. > > > > > > > > > > > > But for the audio mute LED features, you'll need really lots of > > > > > > other > > > > > > works if it were implemented via leds device. That's the hardest > > > > > > part, and a few lines of hooks solves it easily in the kernel side. > > > > > > That's all about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are ready for submitting the real solutions in user-space > > > > > > side > > > > > > (patching PulseAudio and whatever all existing sound daemons, and > > > > > > creating yet another daemon for non-PA systems (another footprint, > > > > > > lovely), and so on), we can happily delete such in-kernel hooks :) > > > > > > > > > > I'm not saying we should move it to the userspace. > > > > > > > > > > I'm saying this should be "normal" led. > > > > > drivers/leds/led-huawei-acpi.c, > > > > > or something. Perhaps this acpi stuff is so similar you don't really > > > > > need .c code. > > > > > > > > > > And then there should be a "mic muted" trigger. Similar to > > > > > drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-disk.c. > > > > > > > > And who will trigger this, e.g. when the mixer is muted? > > > > > > Is this settled? I'm encouraged to promote this series to our for-next > > > branch. > > > > I'd prefer this to be normal LED and "mic muted" to become normal > > trigger. > > But how would you solve the existing problem? > > As already mentioned, you'll need to hook the LED trigger and the > actual mixer value change. This is the biggest missing piece, and > it's the very reason we have the exported symbol from the platform > driver side. > > So, if you prefer in that way, please implement that for the existing > driver (thinkpad_acpi and dell-laptop) at first. I'll be really happy > to get rid of the present ugly solution! But it's been there just > because it's not so trivial at all. FWIW, this must be all done > inside the kernel; otherwise you'll hit a regression.
I am really have enough work to do at the moment, but let me take a look. > If the path via leds class can't be achieved quickly, I'd prefer > taking the current approach at first. Once after it's done for those > above, we can apply the same for huawei-wmi later, too. I'd prefer not adding more mess. Don't expect full solution from me, but ... I should have something better than what is in the tree rather soon. Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature