On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 20:27:16 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:

> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rost...@goodmis.org>
> 
> The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it.

This looks able to be applied without this series. I think we should
apply this to for-next branch?

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Thanks,


> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/ftrace.h | 10 ----------
>  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> index 477ff9412d26..5544df21a886 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> @@ -819,11 +819,6 @@ extern void ftrace_graph_init_task(struct task_struct 
> *t);
>  extern void ftrace_graph_exit_task(struct task_struct *t);
>  extern void ftrace_graph_init_idle_task(struct task_struct *t, int cpu);
>  
> -static inline int task_curr_ret_stack(struct task_struct *t)
> -{
> -     return t->curr_ret_stack;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void pause_graph_tracing(void)
>  {
>       atomic_inc(&current->tracing_graph_pause);
> @@ -847,11 +842,6 @@ static inline int register_ftrace_graph(struct 
> fgraph_ops *ops);
>  }
>  static inline void unregister_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *ops) { }
>  
> -static inline int task_curr_ret_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
> -{
> -     return -1;
> -}
> -
>  static inline unsigned long
>  ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx, unsigned long ret,
>                     unsigned long *retp)
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to