On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 20:27:16 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rost...@goodmis.org> > > The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it. This looks able to be applied without this series. I think we should apply this to for-next branch? Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org> > --- > include/linux/ftrace.h | 10 ---------- > 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h > index 477ff9412d26..5544df21a886 100644 > --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h > +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h > @@ -819,11 +819,6 @@ extern void ftrace_graph_init_task(struct task_struct > *t); > extern void ftrace_graph_exit_task(struct task_struct *t); > extern void ftrace_graph_init_idle_task(struct task_struct *t, int cpu); > > -static inline int task_curr_ret_stack(struct task_struct *t) > -{ > - return t->curr_ret_stack; > -} > - > static inline void pause_graph_tracing(void) > { > atomic_inc(¤t->tracing_graph_pause); > @@ -847,11 +842,6 @@ static inline int register_ftrace_graph(struct > fgraph_ops *ops); > } > static inline void unregister_ftrace_graph(struct fgraph_ops *ops) { } > > -static inline int task_curr_ret_stack(struct task_struct *tsk) > -{ > - return -1; > -} > - > static inline unsigned long > ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx, unsigned long ret, > unsigned long *retp) > -- > 2.19.1 > > -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>