On 08/11/18 8:46 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> [181108 08:36]: >> I believe with v1 all of this can be merged via ASoC tree as the chances of >> conflicts are low for the touched arch/arm files. But Sekhar and Tony can >> correct me if I'm wrong. > > Good to see this :) Yes merging these changes via the ASoC tree makes > sense to me. I will take a look and ack when you post the version > without RFC.
Looks good to me too. And fine with the series getting merged through ASoC. But will appreciate an immutable commit over v4.20-rc1 in case I do end up queuing something that clashes with changes here (especially worried about the defconfig changes - those are notorious for merge conflicts, and are pain to resolve). I will test this once the non-RFC version is posted. Thanks, Sekhar
