This doesn't look worth zeroing half of the struct
when it is initialized to non-zeros then.

Denis Cheng wrote:
>>From 4d87e14b67890f06885a76b5792ca034de2e9d06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:53:58 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_zalloc to
> remove some following zero initializations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  fs/dcache.c |   12 ++----------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index 0e73aa0..8c559b2 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc(struct dentry * parent, const
> struct qstr *name)
>       struct dentry *dentry;
>       char *dname;
>  
> -     dentry = kmem_cache_alloc(dentry_cache, GFP_KERNEL); 
> +     dentry = kmem_cache_zalloc(dentry_cache, GFP_KERNEL); 
>       if (!dentry)
>               return NULL;
>  
> @@ -921,15 +921,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc(struct dentry * parent,
> const struct qstr *name)
>       atomic_set(&dentry->d_count, 1);
>       dentry->d_flags = DCACHE_UNHASHED;
>       spin_lock_init(&dentry->d_lock);
> -     dentry->d_inode = NULL;
> -     dentry->d_parent = NULL;
> -     dentry->d_sb = NULL;
> -     dentry->d_op = NULL;
> -     dentry->d_fsdata = NULL;
> -     dentry->d_mounted = 0;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROFILING
> -     dentry->d_cookie = NULL;
> -#endif
> +
>       INIT_HLIST_NODE(&dentry->d_hash);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_lru);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_subdirs);

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to