On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:24:16 +0000 Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Alex, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 11:26 AM > > To: Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>; Bjorn Helgaas > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Linux Kernel Mailing List > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; David Daney > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark NXP LS1088 to avoid bus reset bus > > > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 05:29:47 +0000 > > Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:46 AM > > > > To: Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: [email protected]; Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>; > > > > linux- [email protected]; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > > > > [email protected]>; [email protected]; David Daney > > > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; > > > > [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark NXP LS1088 to avoid bus reset bus > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:32 PM Bharat Bhushan > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:39 PM > > > > > > To: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> > > > > > > Cc: Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]>; > > > > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > > > > [email protected]; David Daney > > <[email protected]>; > > > > Jan > > > > > > Glauber <[email protected]>; Maik Broemme > > > > <[email protected]>; > > > > > > Chris Blake <[email protected]> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark NXP LS1088 to avoid bus reset bus > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:33:56 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > 4) Is there a hardware erratum for this? If so, please > > > > > > > include the URL here. > > > > > > > > > > No h/w errata as of now. > > > > > > > > Does that mean (a) the HW folks agree this is a hardware problem but > > > > they haven't written an erratum, (b) there is an erratum but it > > > > isn't public, (c) we don't have any concrete evidence of a hardware > > > > problem, but things just don't work if we do a bus reset, (d) something > > > > > > else? > > > > > > I will say it is (c) - not concluded to be hardware h/w issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > In pci_reset_secondary_bus() I have tried to increase the delay > > > > > after reset > > > > but not helped. > > > > > Do I need to add delay at some other place as well? > > > > > > > > No, I think the place you tried should be enough. > > > > > > > > You should also be able to exercise this from user-space by using > > > > "setpci" to set and clear the Secondary Bus Reset bit in the Bridge > > > > Control register. Then you can also use setpci to read/write config > > > > space of the NIC. The kernel would normally read the Vendor and > > > > Device IDs as the first access to the device during enumeration. > > > > You also might be able to learn something by using "lspci -vv" on > > > > the bridge before and after the reset to see if it logs any AER bits > > > > (if it > > supports AER) or the other standard error logging bits. > > > > > > I tried below sequence for Secondary bus reset and device config space > > > show 0xff > > > > > > root@localhost:~# lspci -x > > > 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Freescale Semiconductor Inc Device 80c0 (rev > > > 10) > > > 00: 57 19 c0 80 07 01 10 00 10 00 04 06 08 00 01 00 > > > 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 01 01 00 00 > > > 20: 00 40 00 40 f1 ff 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 63 01 00 00 > > > > > > 0002:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit > > > Network Connection > > > 00: 86 80 d3 10 06 04 10 00 00 00 00 02 10 00 00 00 > > > 10: 00 00 0c 40 00 00 00 40 01 00 00 00 00 00 0e 40 > > > 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 86 80 1f a0 > > > 30: 00 00 24 40 c8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 63 01 00 00 > > > > > > root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x3e.b=0x40 > > > root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x3e.b=0x00 > > > > > > root@localhost:~# lspci -x > > > 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Freescale Semiconductor Inc Device 80c0 (rev > > > 10) > > > 00: 57 19 c0 80 07 01 10 00 10 00 04 06 08 00 01 00 > > > 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 01 01 00 00 > > > 20: 00 40 00 40 f1 ff 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 63 01 00 00 > > > > Just for curiosity sake, what if you re-write the secondary and subordinate > > bus registers here: > > > > # setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x19.b=0x01 > > # setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x1a.b=0xff > > Result is same, here are logs > > root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x3e.b=0x40 > root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x3e.b=0x00 > root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x19.b=0x01 > root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x1a.b=0xff > root@localhost:~# lspci -x > 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Freescale Semiconductor Inc Device 80c0 (rev 10) > 00: 57 19 c0 80 07 01 10 00 10 00 04 06 08 00 01 00 > 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 01 01 00 00 > 20: 00 40 00 40 f1 ff 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 63 01 00 00 > > 0002:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network > Connection (rev ff) > 00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > 10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > 20: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > 30: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff Ok, thanks for scratching my itch. > > IIRC the users that debugged the AMD bus reset issue re-wrote the entire 64 > > bytes of the bridge config header and then further narrowed the issue down > > to the two registers above. If one bridge implementation can have such an > > issue, maybe others do too. Perhaps there's common IP in use. > > > Are you able > > to test other endpoints besides this e1000e device with this setpci > > technique? Thanks, > > I tried with " Broadcom Limited NetXtreme BCM5722 Gigabit Ethernet PCI > Express" I observe same issue. Personally I'd exhaust talking with your hardware folks before blocking bus resets at the software level, it seems like a gap in PCIe compliance of the device. Thanks, Alex
