On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 5:10 AM Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri 2018-11-30 15:42:05, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 06:53:23PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > Use a proper PHY driver, instead of hooks to a board support package. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]> > > > Tested-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]> > > > > These should have an ack from the USB PHY maintainer before we apply them. > > I don't see him cc:d on these patches though (Felipe)? > > I put him into cc now. > > USB PHY LAYER > M: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> > L: [email protected] > T: git > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git > S: Maintained > F: drivers/usb/phy/ > > I guess linux-usb list should be cc-ed, too...
Yeah, and depending on how his mail subscriptions work, he might just get the above email and not the patch. Lubo, I suggest resending the remaining patches and making sure that the maintainers are on cc (and the corresponding lists). If you ask for their ack instead of to pick up the patch, we can merge it through our tree. -Olof
