4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tim Chen [email protected]

commit 8eb729b77faf83ac4c1f363a9ad68d042415f24c upstream

"Reduced Data Speculation" is an obsolete term. The correct new name is
"Speculative store bypass disable" - which is abbreviated into SSBD.

Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
Cc: Asit Mallick <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Cc: Jon Masters <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Stewart <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct thread_info {
 #define TIF_SIGPENDING         2       /* signal pending */
 #define TIF_NEED_RESCHED       3       /* rescheduling necessary */
 #define TIF_SINGLESTEP         4       /* reenable singlestep on user return*/
-#define TIF_SSBD                       5       /* Reduced data speculation */
+#define TIF_SSBD               5       /* Speculative store bypass disable */
 #define TIF_SYSCALL_EMU                6       /* syscall emulation active */
 #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT      7       /* syscall auditing active */
 #define TIF_SECCOMP            8       /* secure computing */


Reply via email to