From: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
> But the code modified here is x86_64 and i386 specific? Is there an > overlap? I see, the acessor is abstracted via a function. That seems pointless, and allows you to do things like this, improving the implementation on one set of platforms yet leave others using SMT/multi-core scheduling behind. It makes a lot more sense to make the implementation consistent and therefore the improvements are seen on every platform. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
