On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:43:12 +0100 Anders Roxell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > + schedulable = !irqs_disabled() && !preempt_count(); > > > > Is there a reason not to use preemptible() here? > > As I understand it preemptible() is defined to 0 if > CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is disabled. > Thats no good right ? No it's not, which means this isn't a good approach. I have a much better idea on how to solve this. I'll post a small patch set in a bit. -- Steve
