Hi! > > On 12/04, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > we really need to narrow the (huge) scope of ->cred_guard_mutex in exec > > paths. > > > > > > > > my attempt to fix this was nacked, and nobody suggested a better > > > > solution > > so far. > > > > > > Any link to your patch and the NAK? > > > > See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ > > > > No questions, the patch wasn't pretty. And imo we need to rework the > > security > > hooks in the long term. > > > > Oleg. > > I am sorry for the reverting this patch. It's also my fault that > I didn't check lockdep. But, We decided to keep this patch in our product. > Freeze fail is a real problem we've had for the last two years, > whereas lockdep's notice is not a real problem. > We hope this issue will be resolved soon.
I guess it makes sense for your usage.
How often do you see the failures without the patch?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
