4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>

commit 58930cced012adb01bc78b3687049b17ef44d0a3 upstream.

As gcc-8 points out, the bit mask check makes no sense here:

drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c: In function 'ext_sd_send_cmd_get_rsp':
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4130:25: error: bitwise comparison always 
evaluates to true [-Werror=tautological-compare]

However, the code is even more bogus, as we have already
checked for the SD_RSP_TYPE_R0 case earlier in the function
and returned success. As seen in the mmc/sd driver core,
SD_RSP_TYPE_R0 means "no response" anyway, so checking for
a particular response would not help either.

This just removes the nonsensical code to get rid of the
warning.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c |    6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
@@ -4125,12 +4125,6 @@ RTY_SEND_CMD:
                                        rtsx_trace(chip);
                                        return STATUS_FAIL;
                                }
-
-                       } else if (rsp_type == SD_RSP_TYPE_R0) {
-                               if ((ptr[3] & 0x1E) != 0x03) {
-                                       rtsx_trace(chip);
-                                       return STATUS_FAIL;
-                               }
                        }
                }
        }


Reply via email to