From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:37:18 +0200
> I think if you leaned back and thought it through, and if you applied > this scenario to a bad scheduler commit from me that broke your box, > you'd readily agree with me =B-) (which scenario is purely hypothetical, > my scheduler commits are all 100% perfect of course ;-) Actually I'd probably send you a patch for any bug I found that triggered on sparc64, since that's faster than asking you to fix a bug that you are unlikely to be able to trigger on your own systems. But that's just how I operate. Ask Thomas Gleixner. Every single hrtimers/nohz bug I've found on sparc64, I sent him either a full fix or a full analysis of the bug and a description of exactly what is going on and what needs to be changed so he can compose the bug fix patch with minimal effort. I don't ask people to revert, ever. It's never necessary when the parties involved are extremely competent and responsive. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
