On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 03:24:14AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > [...] > > > Anwyay, so I'm thinking of adding: > > > > > > struct inode; > > > > > > int is_not_owner(struct inode *) > > > > ^static inline ^inode > > > > of course. > > > > { > > > return ((current->fsuid != inode->i_uid) && !capable(CAP_FOWNER)); > > > } > > This is pointless. If you do not have definition of struct inode > already available, you'll get breakage on access to ->i_uid.
Yes, I realized that later :-) That was just a (dumb) sketch typed into the mailer ... I'll send out the conversion patch after compiling + booting, of course. Thanks, Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/