On Thursday 19 July 2007 16:46:31 Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:48:36PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
I didn't. If you guys really want to have a thread to criticize the changelog (which seems quite bogus, after all we're interested in code here, not changelogs) then please at least get your attributions right. Regarding highmem instability: there are still known ways to drive systems with larger highmem ratios to early OOM or deadlock, although they are relatively obscure. -Andi > > > Some users may want NX > > or expanded swapspace support without the overhead or instability of > > highmem. > > NX is still going to need the larger PTEs, so I don't see how this > change removes any 'overhead' or potential 'instability'. > I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the change, but this part > of the changelog seems to be false advertising. > > Dave > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
