On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 20:00 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thursday 19 July 2007 19:43:49 Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 19:38 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Thursday 19 July 2007 19:31:56 Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > > > >From my perspective a downside to sched_clock is that the math is > > > > duplicated per architecture .. I think it would be a win to use the > > > > generic functions if it's possible.. > > > > > > They can't be used because they're not cpu local. The whole basic > > > concept behind the new sched_clock is to be cpu local. > > > > Your not following me .. > > Because you don't make much sense. You're really asking me to factor > an single multiplication and a shift (two CPU instructions!) out to share?
Yes, but I also said that was only part of the duplication. Your already doing a re-write, there is no reason not to add this.. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
