On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Satyam Sharma pisze: > > [...] > > Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's > > time to go through git log and see how to fix that build breakage > > myself ... > > > > Michal, how did you even manage to build / boot this kernel! > > I commented origin.patch and mm.patch in series file, reverted xfs patches, > fixed libata build, deselected unionfs. > > Here is a patch for libata > > --- linux-work3-clean/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-07-20 16:53:26.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-work3/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-07-20 17:26:30.000000000 +0200 > @@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device > dev->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, ATA_MAX_SECTORS_128, > dev->max_sectors); > > - if (ata_device_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) { > + if (ata_dev_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) { > dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM; > > /* reset link pm_policy for this port to no pm */And to think I went through all those hoops just to avoid *this* ... :-( Anyway, please apply the attached patch and let's verify if we're both actually bit by the same bug.
kernel/params.c: In function 'kernel_param_sysfs_setup': kernel/params.c:571: error: implicit declaration of function 'printf' make[1]: *** [kernel/params.o] Error 1 make: *** [kernel] Error 2 fixed :)
A screenshot of my case is available at: http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/ssatyam/mtrr.show-bug.jpg [ excuse the quality, it's not a digicam, but a cellphone-cam ] Satyam
Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
