Paul Mundt wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:21PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: >> Paul Mundt wrote: >> Tangential question. Which is the currently recommended cross toolchain >> for sh64? With "gcc 3.2 20020529", "binutils 020306 20030206" (some >> binary toolchain from ~2 years ago somewhere off the web) I get [1]
<error snipped> >> gcc 3.4.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x don't build for me from source >> (target -superh-linux-gnu, binutils 2.15.x or 2.17.x). > > I've been using sh64-linux targetted toolchains created from the gentoo > crossdev, which works fine with stock versions. I can send you a tarball > of the toolchain off-list if you like. Binutils, gcc versions would be fine to. Meanwhile I got binutils 2.17.50.0.17.20070615 and gcc 4.1.3 20070704 (prerelease) to compile (supplying it with uclibc- and lk-headers). But compiling 2.6.22-git17 now fails with CC drivers/video/cfbimgblt.o CC drivers/video/fb_defio.o LD drivers/video/built-in.o LD drivers/built-in.o sh64-linux-ld: sh3 architecture of input file `drivers/media/built-in.o' is incompatible with sh5 output sh64-linux-ld: sh3 architecture of input file `drivers/i2c/built-in.o' is incompatible with sh5 output make[2]: *** [drivers/built-in.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2 make: *** [_all] Error 2 Known? Thanks, Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/